For (1) in view of OCDS 2.0 (where the installation contract and extractions are performed in the same procedure), we need to ensure that we can continue to model the lifecycle of the installation contract. But one of the main differences is that a framework agreement in itself is NOT a purchase obligation. There is currently no mapping for this area in the EU profile (see open-contracting-extensions/european-union#31), but as this information is important for users to understand how to interpret public procurement values and as framework conditions are used outside the EU context, we should consider this as a basic extension for TOC. In the current EU mapping, tender.techniques.hasFrameworkAgreement is defined if the market involves the establishment of a framework agreement. In a compiled statement, however, there would be no way to distinguish the award that establishes the framework contract from extractions. . . .